You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the saving API is extremely limited. Users can add tags to the IFDs to save a description or change the compression, etc. This is clunky and hard to use. It would be better to expose keywords for common properties such that you do the following:
Naturally, if the user is supplying a subtype of AbstractTIFF we would need a way to merge the provided tag values with the tags already present in the IFD of the image.
Some properties that I can imagine being useful to set this way are:
Currently, the saving API is extremely limited. Users can add tags to the IFDs to save a description or change the compression, etc. This is clunky and hard to use. It would be better to expose keywords for common properties such that you do the following:
Naturally, if the user is supplying a subtype of
AbstractTIFF
we would need a way to merge the provided tag values with the tags already present in the IFD of the image.Some properties that I can imagine being useful to set this way are:
Basically the API used in the ImageJ demo: https://tamasnagy.com/TiffImages.jl/dev/demos/common/imagej/#Writing-ImageJ-compatible-metadata should be easier to use/discover. We should still allow for the nitty gritty fine grained control of that example, but have a simpler option for folks too.
Thoughts @chrstphrbrns with regards to compression?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: