Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can we add buildx support? #32

Closed
hansbogert opened this issue May 4, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

Can we add buildx support? #32

hansbogert opened this issue May 4, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@hansbogert
Copy link

I'm starting to rely on docker buildx for its intermediate stages cache support, can we add buildx support to this image?

@tmaier
Copy link
Owner

tmaier commented May 4, 2021

What do you mean exactly? Can you provide a link? What is missing?

@hansbogert
Copy link
Author

hansbogert commented May 4, 2021

sorry, I've been exposed to it too much. But it's an installed-by-default option for about any docker distribution (docker desktop, docker through APT/deb, etc), except when you use their own docker image.

Please see https://docs.docker.com/buildx/working-with-buildx/

@tmaier
Copy link
Owner

tmaier commented Jun 30, 2021

Hi @hansbogert,

I am undecided. Somehow I would like the users of this image to have a say in this. But that kind of voting feature does not exist.

Can you prepare a Pull Request so that we see the impact from image size perspective and if it works for all versions supported

@petski
Copy link

petski commented May 9, 2022

As a FYI, someone is working to get buildx and compose (docker compose v2) part of the official docker images. See docker-library/docker#361

@tmaier
Copy link
Owner

tmaier commented Nov 1, 2022

@petski this is great news!
I also tested it. It works.

This means we can deprecate this Docker image here. See 78b050b

@tmaier tmaier closed this as completed Nov 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants