Generic transports
#2674
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Yes, it is planned for 0.8: #2479 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
Perfect, thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
It seems like TcpListener/TcpStream are pretty deeply embedded in the current high level APIs. I know the serve-with-hyper example exists, but it seems to essentially be copying (axum internals?)
into_futurejust to get a few customization points. It is also something that would need periodic updating asinto_futuregets more and more sophisticated.Are generic transports something you would be interested in? The goal would basically be so users can supply their own listeners and/or streams to high level APIs and have axum run transparently on top of them.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions