You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
PROT[mod:Fe[III]]EOFORM
Nested brackets need to considered for the fairly common case that they are within descriptors.
Unclosed brackets
PROT[info:jk :] lol]EOFORM
I don't think handling unclosed brackets is worth it, so I'd suggest throwing parsing and writing errors if the number of [ doesn't match that of ].
Back-to-back unclosed brackets
PROT[info:jk :] [: lol]EOFORM
PROT[info:unclosed][brackets]EOFORM
PROT[info:Unclosed]B[rackets]EOFORM
These are wacky, considering back-to-back unclosed brackets within descriptors. These will lead to unexpected behavior because we assume closed brackets are tags. We should consider making a writer exception if the user tries to write these types of unclosed brackets in descriptors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Nested brackets
PROT[mod:Fe[III]]EOFORM
Nested brackets need to considered for the fairly common case that they are within descriptors.
Unclosed brackets
PROT[info:jk :] lol]EOFORM
I don't think handling unclosed brackets is worth it, so I'd suggest throwing parsing and writing errors if the number of
[
doesn't match that of]
.Back-to-back unclosed brackets
PROT[info:jk :] [: lol]EOFORM
PROT[info:unclosed][brackets]EOFORM
PROT[info:Unclosed]B[rackets]EOFORM
These are wacky, considering back-to-back unclosed brackets within descriptors. These will lead to unexpected behavior because we assume closed brackets are tags. We should consider making a writer exception if the user tries to write these types of unclosed brackets in descriptors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: