You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As mentioned on topepo.github.io, own models can be specified to find an optimal threshold in care::train() in cases where it may be needed due to class imbalance.
The example (using rf) works by creating submodels and a loop.
This cannot be easily applied to models that already use submodels and a loop like gbm and xgb.
How can I optimize the threshold using CV in those cases?
I tried to just loop through all options, but seem to be unable to make this inefficient option work.
Can an explanation or even a feature be added for those cases?
The option that I would go for instead is to train models using CV without optimizing the threshold, then optimizing the threshold using caret::thresholder(). But even if I implemented some makeshift CV in the post-training thresholding, the potentially optimal models could be discarded in caret::train() since it is inferior to other models given the default threshold.
Thank you and best Regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As mentioned on topepo.github.io, own models can be specified to find an optimal threshold in care::train() in cases where it may be needed due to class imbalance.
The example (using rf) works by creating submodels and a loop.
This cannot be easily applied to models that already use submodels and a loop like gbm and xgb.
How can I optimize the threshold using CV in those cases?
I tried to just loop through all options, but seem to be unable to make this inefficient option work.
Can an explanation or even a feature be added for those cases?
The option that I would go for instead is to train models using CV without optimizing the threshold, then optimizing the threshold using caret::thresholder(). But even if I implemented some makeshift CV in the post-training thresholding, the potentially optimal models could be discarded in caret::train() since it is inferior to other models given the default threshold.
Thank you and best Regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: