You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the article "Short factoring proofs" under "Security parameters:" you list among others "$m$, and $K$". However, $K$ is never used in the rest of the article. Instead, $m$ takes the role of $K$ (from the original paper [PS00]), denoting the number of $z_i$'s. I suggest to rename $m$ to $K$, or vice versa, so that there are no more redundant security parameters.
Also, it would be nice to give more details on the choice of $K$/$m$ in the respective section "Choice of security parameters". For example, you write "$B$ and $\ell$ should satisfy $\ell \cdot \log B = \theta(k)$", so you could add something like "$K$/$m$ should be approximately equal to $k$" (or, heuristically, even smaller, cf. [PS00]).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the article "Short factoring proofs" under "Security parameters:" you list among others "$m$, and$K$ ". However, $K$ is never used in the rest of the article. Instead, $m$ takes the role of $K$ (from the original paper [PS00]), denoting the number of $z_i$ 's. I suggest to rename $m$ to $K$ , or vice versa, so that there are no more redundant security parameters.$K$ /$m$ in the respective section "Choice of security parameters". For example, you write "$B$ and $\ell$ should satisfy $\ell \cdot \log B = \theta(k)$ ", so you could add something like "$K$/$m$ should be approximately equal to $k$ " (or, heuristically, even smaller, cf. [PS00]).
Also, it would be nice to give more details on the choice of
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: