bug: Certain cases interpreted as subscript instead of generic_type

[JaagupAverin]

Did you check existing issues?

• I have read all the tree-sitter docs if it relates to using the parser
• I have searched the existing issues of tree-sitter-python

Tree-Sitter CLI Version, if relevant (output of tree-sitter --version)

No response

Describe the bug

In certain cases where we deal with generics (such as user defined generic classes), the generics between square brackets get interpreted as a subscript as opposed to a generic.

Steps To Reproduce/Bad Parse Tree

1. e.g in Tree-sitter playground:

x: list[int] = 0
y: type[int] = int

2. list[int] is correctly classified as a generic_type
3. type[int] is incorrectly classified as subscript

Alternatively for similar output:

class MyGeneric[T]:
	pass
    
MyAlias = MyGeneric[int]

Expected Behavior/Parse Tree

Both cases should be generic_types.

Repro

No response

[amaanq]

The first case is definitely solvable, but the second case not so much, because it's truly ambiguous as to whether or not it's a subscript or a generic type. That would require semantic information about the code, which is typically something an interpreter/compiler/LSP does, and not tree-sitter