-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 280
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Somehow let Reek examine ruby files that don't have the .rb extension #721
Comments
file Rakefile
Rakefile: ASCII text No way of doing that without shebang. 1.) We expect ruby files to have a shebang and then use |
I would say we use at least option 3, and then either 1 or 2. It looks like mimemagic implements at least the shebang method. I'd also have a look at how Rubocop does this. |
👍 for whitelisting |
This will be a while since even generating a new gem project with bundler will create a Gemfile rather than gems.rb 😿. |
Yes, they can’t change it in Bundler 1.x, but |
Reek currently won't examine your Rakefile or executables (bin/whatever) because they don't have the
.rb
extension. We should do something smart here.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: