Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New maven version with AArch64 binary #133

Open
rhenwood-arm opened this issue Oct 16, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

New maven version with AArch64 binary #133

rhenwood-arm opened this issue Oct 16, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@rhenwood-arm
Copy link

I see AArch64 support arrived in this library about a year ago [1]. It seems the most recent 0.4.20 release in Maven includes this change but is missing the AArch64 native binary [2].
Can this issue be resolved?

  1. 5dc97e9.
  2. https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.hadoop.gplcompression/hadoop-lzo/0.4.20
@sjlee
Copy link
Collaborator

sjlee commented Oct 17, 2017

We did add support for ARM so it can build cleanly on that arch. That said, publishing an artifact to maven that includes binaries on that architecture is a separate matter. It would not be feasible to build for all kinds of OS flavors in the binary Twitter publishes to the maven central. Thus, it was a pretty deliberate decision on our part to build only for the Linux 64 bit. We don't even build for Mac or Windows.

If you need binaries for your platform, please build it from the source and use that instead.

I am no longer at Twitter, so I'd defer the follow-up to Twitter's Hadoop team.

@rhenwood-arm
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the background and prompt reply.

Twitter's Hadoop team: do you have thoughs on this issue?

@ctrezzo
Copy link

ctrezzo commented Oct 18, 2017

I think @sjlee 's answer is pretty spot on. If you wanted to build and host binaries for ARM separately, I could see adding a section to the read me pointing users to those binaries.

@rhenwood-arm
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the prompt reply.

My goal is for AArch64 users, like myself, to follow the same instructions as everyone else and end up with an optimal solution. To that end, can you explain why it is not feasible to build for Linux AArch64?

I am highly motivated to understand the problem here so I can help develop a solution.

best regards
Richard

@vielmetti
Copy link

If resources are needed for the build and host process, I'll offer up the Works on Arm cluster - details at http://worksonarm.com/cluster and/or http://github.com/worksonarm/cluster .

I'm not familiar with the production build environment - are the binaries being created by Travis right now?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants