Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question] featuring react-typescript-cheatsheet in Docusaurus #216

Closed
hong4rc opened this issue Apr 14, 2020 · 15 comments
Closed

[Question] featuring react-typescript-cheatsheet in Docusaurus #216

hong4rc opened this issue Apr 14, 2020 · 15 comments
Assignees
Labels
wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@hong4rc
Copy link

hong4rc commented Apr 14, 2020

facebook/docusaurus#1437

Hello, we would like to feature your project to the Docusaurus users page?

And can you deploy the document website? (github.io or another your domain)

@hong4rc hong4rc added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Apr 14, 2020
@eps1lon
Copy link
Member

eps1lon commented Apr 14, 2020

Sounds awesome!

@sw-yx Wants to setup search with algolia first (#214 (comment)).

@eps1lon eps1lon removed the good first issue Good for newcomers label Apr 14, 2020
@hong4rc
Copy link
Author

hong4rc commented Apr 14, 2020

Sounds awesome!

@sw-yx Wants to setup search with algolia first (#214 (comment)).
Can you ping me (when your project website publish)?

@eps1lon
Copy link
Member

eps1lon commented Apr 14, 2020

Can you ping me (when your project website publish)?

Sure.

@swyxio
Copy link
Collaborator

swyxio commented Apr 19, 2020

hey! sorry i have been busy with a personal project. im gonna spend the next couple hours sorting this out, but meanwhile feel free to feature

@swyxio
Copy link
Collaborator

swyxio commented Apr 19, 2020

hey folks - docsite is here! needs more work but feel free to link from docusaurus! https://react-typescript-cheatsheet.netlify.app/ cc @wgao19 fyi

@wgao19
Copy link
Contributor

wgao19 commented May 26, 2020

wow this is nice, a solid usage of using Docusaurus as a nodebook other than a doc site, and i think it does make the original content easier to navigate through as well

should definitely showcase this @yangshun

@yangshun
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the note @wgao19! Yeah let's do showcase it! @hong4rc mind creating a PR for this?

@yangshun
Copy link
Contributor

Any thoughts against migrating this website to Docusaurus v2? :)

@swyxio
Copy link
Collaborator

swyxio commented May 26, 2020

none, just havent spent the time yet :) i think we had a volunteer a few days ago

@yangshun
Copy link
Contributor

@slorber WDYT about migrating the site to v2 to get familiar with v2?

@slorber
Copy link
Collaborator

slorber commented May 26, 2020

sure, was about to ask you for a site to migrate ;)

@swyxio
Copy link
Collaborator

swyxio commented May 26, 2020

@slorber i think our initial implementation broke up the sections too much into individual pages, it breaks the flow. if it helps, u can consolidate sections back together based on your judgment. if youre not sure then dont worry about it, i can do it when i have time

@slorber
Copy link
Collaborator

slorber commented May 27, 2020

@sw-yx there's normally no problem in v2 to have multiple levels of nesting, so I'd rather keep the current structure for the migration, and then you make the changes if you feel it's worth to flatten a folder

Follow the v2 migration in this draft PR: #233

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 20, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!

@stale stale bot added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Aug 20, 2020
@swyxio
Copy link
Collaborator

swyxio commented Aug 20, 2020

@hong4rc looks like we are good to go :)

@swyxio swyxio closed this as completed Aug 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants