You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue is a summary of the conversation on May 28/29 2024 regarding embargoed items and UX.
Background:
most items don't have embargoes
some have embargoes for <5 years (limited by the current UI)
a handful (<17) have embargo dates longer than 5 years
a process using the Solr information checks if the embargo date has passed and removed the embargo and changes visibility to the specified value
embargo date
Findings during the investigation:
embargo dates that go beyond our lifetimes, let along system lifetimes, e.g., 2162-01-01T07:00:00Z: how to gracefully handle?
UI limited the embargo date to +- 5 years impacts editing material - how to gracefully handle the instances beyond 5 years?
For example, ... it would only allow me to embargo something, if done manually, up to 2029, or back to 2020, because only 10 facets in the drop-down menu can be shown. If, however, I go back into the entry, it will allow me to embargo up to 2034, since the median facet is 2029. If I save that, then go back again, it will then allow up to 2039, and so forth. This is obviously not ideal, but it is a workaround when doing things manually.
should an automated audit be implemented to scan for embargo entry errors and automated embargo release to find problems before users (prevent letters from lawyers)
should a response plan be documented for when this situation occurs?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue is a summary of the conversation on May 28/29 2024 regarding embargoed items and UX.
Background:
Findings during the investigation:
embargo dates that go beyond our lifetimes, let along system lifetimes, e.g., 2162-01-01T07:00:00Z: how to gracefully handle?
UI limited the embargo date to +- 5 years impacts editing material - how to gracefully handle the instances beyond 5 years?
should an automated audit be implemented to scan for embargo entry errors and automated embargo release to find problems before users (prevent letters from lawyers)
should a response plan be documented for when this situation occurs?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: