Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UIP-16 - Change block rewards + Consolidate hard forks to one hard fork #16

Closed
jyap808 opened this issue Oct 4, 2021 · 21 comments
Closed
Labels
Completed Voting completed

Comments

@jyap808
Copy link
Member

jyap808 commented Oct 4, 2021

Simple summary

This UIP will combine the hard forks in UIP #10 and UIP #14 into 1 hard fork.

This UIP will also incorporate UIP #11, UIP #12 and a modified version of UIP #13.

We will also skip the Escher vote as we have gathered enough surrounding community feedback.

Abstract

The core developers have discussed and we would like to implement the changes ASAP based on community feedback.

This will allow us to implement these consensus changes in the most efficient and safest way possible.

Combined hard fork

UIP #10 and UIP #14 are set up as 2 hard forks however these require additional code and testing to separate out EIP-1559 code. It is much more easier and safer to do this without the additional code and in one hard fork.

This UIP proposes performing 1 hard fork.

Modified UIP #13

Community feedback has mentioned that the UIP #13 setting of 2 UBQ is "too high". As the surrounding UIPs (UIP #11, UIP #12) also change monetary policy, we must implement them ALL as they complement and balance each other out.

This UIP changes the setting of UIP #13 to 1.5 UBQ per block and is based on community feedback.

No Escher vote for this UIP

Since we have gathered enough surrounding community feedback, there will be no Escher vote on this implementation.

Performing an Escher vote will require extra development to a new voting system based on Snapshot.

Performing an Escher vote will also lead to further delays on what we consider to be strong community consensus on the path forward.

Implementation

All the above changes will be implemented in a hard fork.

@iquidus
Copy link
Member

iquidus commented Oct 4, 2021

This UIP has my full support.

@johndoe1827
Copy link

This UIP has my full support

@weifageo
Copy link

weifageo commented Oct 4, 2021

Great to see the modified UIP-13 based on the community feedback. I fully support this UIP as well.

@jyap808 jyap808 pinned this issue Oct 4, 2021
@svenrenhoek
Copy link

We could use Escher if the voting period is greater than a few days - that way we can provide users an opportunity to unstake, vote, and restake, when gas prices are low.

@jyap808
Copy link
Member Author

jyap808 commented Oct 4, 2021

We could use Escher if the voting period is greater than a few days - that way we can provide users an opportunity to unstake, vote, and restake, when gas prices are low.

The goal of this UIP is to reduce implementation time, extra development and improved safety.

Further discussion of using Escher would involve voting on UIP 13. This UIP does not involve Escher voting and takes into account discussions made on prior UIPs.

@jyap808
Copy link
Member Author

jyap808 commented Oct 4, 2021

This UIP has my full support.

@svenrenhoek
Copy link

We could use Escher if the voting period is greater than a few days - that way we can provide users an opportunity to unstake, vote, and restake, when gas prices are low.

The goal of this UIP is to reduce implementation time, extra development and improved safety.

Further discussion of using Escher would involve voting on UIP 13. This UIP does not involve Escher voting and takes into account discussions made on prior UIPs.

Understood. It's not a contentious issue for me.

This UIP has my full support.

@LessDaStress
Copy link

Thank you all for sharing your feedback, opinion and debating the UIPs. For someone like me who is still learning, this has been very enlightening. Learned a lot and happy to be part of this.

Considering all the arguments put forward, this UIP has my full support. Looking forward to see this UIP implemented soon.

@jpatel888
Copy link

This UIP has my full support.

@ElevenXi
Copy link

ElevenXi commented Oct 5, 2021

This UIP has my full support

@hekkort
Copy link

hekkort commented Oct 5, 2021

This UIP has my full support, gm

@Bullchad123
Copy link
Member

Full support this UIP has from me

@halop
Copy link

halop commented Oct 5, 2021

full support ;-D

@outragedhuman
Copy link

This UIP has my full support

@crp9
Copy link

crp9 commented Oct 5, 2021

Affirmative, this UIP has my support. Was a very insightful venture to be a part of this system and how my questions were answered cheers!

@erikrijn
Copy link
Member

erikrijn commented Oct 5, 2021

Full support from me.

@skywalk3rUBQ
Copy link

Full speed ahead!

@jeewaka
Copy link

jeewaka commented Oct 5, 2021

My full support to this UIP

@ZenithII
Copy link

ZenithII commented Oct 5, 2021

This uip has my full support

@maaatttt
Copy link
Member

maaatttt commented Oct 6, 2021

UIP-16 has my full support.

@iquidus iquidus added Developing development work in progress and removed Feedback wanted labels Dec 16, 2021
@jyap808 jyap808 added Completed Voting completed and removed Developing development work in progress labels Dec 22, 2021
@jyap808
Copy link
Member Author

jyap808 commented Dec 22, 2021

Closing issue. Pending hard fork.

@jyap808 jyap808 closed this as completed Dec 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Completed Voting completed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests