-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
UIP-16 - Change block rewards + Consolidate hard forks to one hard fork #16
Comments
This UIP has my full support. |
This UIP has my full support |
Great to see the modified UIP-13 based on the community feedback. I fully support this UIP as well. |
We could use Escher if the voting period is greater than a few days - that way we can provide users an opportunity to unstake, vote, and restake, when gas prices are low. |
The goal of this UIP is to reduce implementation time, extra development and improved safety. Further discussion of using Escher would involve voting on UIP 13. This UIP does not involve Escher voting and takes into account discussions made on prior UIPs. |
This UIP has my full support. |
Understood. It's not a contentious issue for me. This UIP has my full support. |
Thank you all for sharing your feedback, opinion and debating the UIPs. For someone like me who is still learning, this has been very enlightening. Learned a lot and happy to be part of this. Considering all the arguments put forward, this UIP has my full support. Looking forward to see this UIP implemented soon. |
This UIP has my full support. |
This UIP has my full support |
This UIP has my full support, gm |
Full support this UIP has from me |
full support ;-D |
This UIP has my full support |
Affirmative, this UIP has my support. Was a very insightful venture to be a part of this system and how my questions were answered cheers! |
Full support from me. |
Full speed ahead! |
My full support to this UIP |
This uip has my full support |
UIP-16 has my full support. |
Closing issue. Pending hard fork. |
Simple summary
This UIP will combine the hard forks in UIP #10 and UIP #14 into 1 hard fork.
This UIP will also incorporate UIP #11, UIP #12 and a modified version of UIP #13.
We will also skip the Escher vote as we have gathered enough surrounding community feedback.
Abstract
The core developers have discussed and we would like to implement the changes ASAP based on community feedback.
This will allow us to implement these consensus changes in the most efficient and safest way possible.
Combined hard fork
UIP #10 and UIP #14 are set up as 2 hard forks however these require additional code and testing to separate out EIP-1559 code. It is much more easier and safer to do this without the additional code and in one hard fork.
This UIP proposes performing 1 hard fork.
Modified UIP #13
Community feedback has mentioned that the UIP #13 setting of 2 UBQ is "too high". As the surrounding UIPs (UIP #11, UIP #12) also change monetary policy, we must implement them ALL as they complement and balance each other out.
This UIP changes the setting of UIP #13 to 1.5 UBQ per block and is based on community feedback.
No Escher vote for this UIP
Since we have gathered enough surrounding community feedback, there will be no Escher vote on this implementation.
Performing an Escher vote will require extra development to a new voting system based on Snapshot.
Performing an Escher vote will also lead to further delays on what we consider to be strong community consensus on the path forward.
Implementation
All the above changes will be implemented in a hard fork.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: