Formatting issue

[gentlementlegen]

There seem to be some formatting issue in the pull-request:
ubiquity-os-marketplace/command-start-stop#4 (comment)

The comment should not be displayed in this case.

[0x4007]

Why not study the old code closer to see why we don't have these problems?

[gentlementlegen]

The old code was totally broken when it came to formatting as well and would cut the results instead. This is an issue regarding the metadata part I think.

[ubiquibot]

@gentlementlegen the deadline is at 2024-08-13T07:38:43.182Z

[gentlementlegen]

@0x4007 It seems that the problem was solved after my changes in #78, see results here by ubiquityos: ubiquity-os-marketplace/command-start-stop#4 (comment). Shall this be closed as completed or not planned?

[0x4007]

You should retroactively link your pull to this issue. Then we have a formal record for audits, and you receive your credit.

However as you know, we generally require targeted pulls (only the relevant changes per one issue) but we can make an exception here.

[gentlementlegen]

@0x4007 Yes I agree, I guess everything went in in one block because we needed the v2 release last week, and because the other task overlapped with this one (and this fix was needed to have everything running properly).
The issue was fixed from this commit: 6b512c5

[ubiquibot]

+ Evaluating results. Please wait...

[ubiquityos]

! Failed to run comment evaluation. Error: execution reverted (no data present; likely require(false) occurred (action="call", data="0x", reason="require(false)", transaction={ "data": "0x95d89b41", "to": "0xe91D153E0b41518A2Ce8Dd3D7944Fa863463a97d" }, invocation=null, revert=null, code=CALL_EXCEPTION, version=6.13.1)

[ubiquibot]

[ 6.1 WXDAI ]

@0x4007

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Comment	2	6.1

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
Why not study the old code closer to see why we don't have these...	1.6	0.47	1.6
You should retroactively link your pull to this issue. Then we h...	4.5	0.68	4.5

[ 82.8 WXDAI ]

@gentlementlegen

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Specification	1	6.2
Issue	Task	1	50
Issue	Comment	3	26.6
Issue	Comment	3	0

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
There seem to be some formatting issue in the pull-request: htt...	6.2	1	6.2
The old code was totally broken when it came to formatting as we...	5.8	0.64	5.8
@0x4007 It seems that the problem was solved after my changes in...	10 code: count: 1 score: "1" words: 1	0.79	10
@0x4007 Yes I agree, I guess everything went in in one block bec...	10.8	0.81	10.8
The old code was totally broken when it came to formatting as we...	-	0.64	-
@0x4007 It seems that the problem was solved after my changes in...	- code: count: 1 score: "0" words: 1	0.79	-
@0x4007 Yes I agree, I guess everything went in in one block bec...	-	0.81	-

[ubiquibot]

@gentlementlegen the deadline is at 2024-08-20T11:14:56.843Z

[ubiquibot]

+ Evaluating results. Please wait...

[ubiquityos]

[ 73.16 WXDAI ]

@gentlementlegen

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Task	1	50
Issue	Specification	1	6
Issue	Comment	3	17.16

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
There seem to be some formatting issue in the pull-request: htt…	6 content: p: count: 20 score: 1 wordValue: 0.1 formattingMultiplier: 3	1	6
The old code was totally broken when it came to formatting as we…	5.8 content: p: count: 29 score: 1 wordValue: 0.2 formattingMultiplier: 1	0.7	4.06
@0x4007 It seems that the problem was solved after my changes in…	5.8 content: p: count: 28 score: 1 code: count: 1 score: 1 wordValue: 0.2 formattingMultiplier: 1	0.8	4.64
@0x4007 Yes I agree, I guess everything went in in one block bec…	9.4 content: p: count: 47 score: 1 wordValue: 0.2 formattingMultiplier: 1	0.9	8.46

[ 3.15 WXDAI ]

@0x4007

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Comment	2	3.15

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
Why not study the old code closer to see why we don't have these…	1.5 content: p: count: 15 score: 1 wordValue: 0.1 formattingMultiplier: 1	0.3	0.45
You should retroactively link your pull to this issue. Then we h…	4.5 content: p: count: 45 score: 1 wordValue: 0.1 formattingMultiplier: 1	0.6	2.7

[ubiquibot]

[ 6.1 WXDAI ]

@0x4007

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Comment	2	6.1

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
Why not study the old code closer to see why we don't have these...	1.6	0.45	1.6
You should retroactively link your pull to this issue. Then we h...	4.5	0.635	4.5

[ 82.8 WXDAI ]

@gentlementlegen

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Specification	1	6.2
Issue	Task	1	50
Issue	Comment	3	26.6
Issue	Comment	3	0

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
There seem to be some formatting issue in the pull-request: htt...	6.2	1	6.2
The old code was totally broken when it came to formatting as we...	5.8	0.67	5.8
@0x4007 It seems that the problem was solved after my changes in...	10 code: count: 1 score: "1" words: 1	0.76	10
@0x4007 Yes I agree, I guess everything went in in one block bec...	10.8	0.85	10.8
The old code was totally broken when it came to formatting as we...	-	0.67	-
@0x4007 It seems that the problem was solved after my changes in...	- code: count: 1 score: "0" words: 1	0.76	-
@0x4007 Yes I agree, I guess everything went in in one block bec...	-	0.85	-

[gentlementlegen]

@0x4007 Seems that updating the packages fixed the issue, at least for now.

[0x4007]

@gentlementlegen Please link the correct pull