New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Why doesn't GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving work in Physics.Constraint?... #45

Open

src-of-truth bot opened this issue May 25, 2018 · 0 comments

src-of-truth bot commented May 25, 2018 •

edited

Loading

Lagrangian multiplier - the (signed) magnitude of the impulse
required to solve a constraint equation.

shapes/shapes/src/Physics/Constraint/Types.hs

Lines 16 to 19 in fa5d959

    
           -- TODO: Why doesn't GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving work in Physics.Constraint? 
        
           -- | Lagrangian multiplier - the (signed) magnitude of the impulse 
        
           -- required to solve a constraint equation. 
        
           newtype Lagrangian =

Found on swizzle
Found on prim
Found on swizzle-noinline
Found on master

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment