Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Choose a release" section on Downloads page should be clarified #77

Open
kumikumi opened this issue Jul 4, 2020 · 1 comment
Open
Labels
feedback Comments or suggestions for improvement presentation Related to the visuals and behaviour

Comments

@kumikumi
Copy link

kumikumi commented Jul 4, 2020

Details about the problem

If you are a novice user who is looking to download the Ubuntu Mate release with "latest features", the downloads page is somewhat misleadingly advertising 19.10 as such. Meanwhile 20.04 LTS is advertised as just being stable and suitable for mission critical systems.

Users should be made aware that 20.04 has the latest features and longest support, and the old interim release (19.10) and old LTS (18.04.4) should be made less prominent.

My suggestion:

On top of the Choose a release page there should be (at any time)

  • Newest LTS
  • Newest interim release, but only if it is newer than newest LTS

Below that there should be "Other releases" section, that has all other currently supported releases listed.

Screenshots

choose-a-release
Current downloads page. "I guess I'll pick the one with the latest features"

Link(s) to the affected pages

https://ubuntu-mate.org/download/amd64/

@kumikumi kumikumi added the presentation Related to the visuals and behaviour label Jul 4, 2020
@lah7
Copy link
Member

lah7 commented Jul 22, 2020

Thanks for the report. Good points - sorry it took a while to get back.

This is a bit of a head scratcher 🤔 since there's pre-releases and architectures/device ports to consider the wording for. Some of the hardware ports only have 19.10 for instance, which is neither supported nor stable.

Right now, the text is shown is determined on whether it's an LTS or interim according to downloads.yml.

I'm thinking to change the download page design, as the current "1-2-3" grid was intended to make it clear between 32-bit and 64-bit PCs as well as suggesting BitTorrent first in efforts to preserve bandwidth. Both of these have become redundant as i386 is reaching end of life and the bandwidth is sponsored.

@lah7 lah7 added the feedback Comments or suggestions for improvement label Jul 22, 2020
@lah7 lah7 self-assigned this Feb 2, 2021
@lah7 lah7 removed their assignment Mar 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feedback Comments or suggestions for improvement presentation Related to the visuals and behaviour
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants