Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need to make sure ABI changed #306

Closed
gcode-importer opened this issue Mar 24, 2014 · 9 comments
Closed

Need to make sure ABI changed #306

gcode-importer opened this issue Mar 24, 2014 · 9 comments

Comments

@gcode-importer
Copy link

Originally reported on Google Code with ID 306

Need to run abi compliance checker to confirm ABI changed in 2.1

Reported by malaterre on 2014-03-24 14:45:25

@gcode-importer
Copy link
Author

This issue was updated by revision r2786.

Reported by malaterre on 2014-03-25 10:23:46

@gcode-importer
Copy link
Author

This issue was updated by revision r2787.

Reported by malaterre on 2014-03-25 10:24:17

@gcode-importer
Copy link
Author

This issue was updated by revision r2788.

Reported by malaterre on 2014-03-25 10:29:10

@gcode-importer
Copy link
Author

So we have an API mostly compatible with 2.0, however because opj_image_t size changed
we cannot be compatible in ABI:

http://openjpeg.googlecode.com/svn/dev-utils/scripts/abi_compat_report.html

SONAME needs to be increased anyway.

Reported by malaterre on 2014-03-25 10:36:00

  • Status changed: Fixed

@gcode-importer
Copy link
Author

Reported by malaterre on 2014-03-25 13:28:32

  • Status changed: Accepted

@gcode-importer
Copy link
Author

After discussion with Antonin: we will have an ABI compatible 2.0.1 release (with FILE*
interface and no alpha chanel). We will also have a 2.1 release with API/ABI breakages
!

Reported by malaterre on 2014-03-25 14:21:28

@mayeut
Copy link
Collaborator

mayeut commented Oct 18, 2015

c.f. #600

@detonin
Copy link
Contributor

detonin commented Jan 25, 2016

ABI changed indeed in 2.1.
New upcoming release 2.1.1 does not introduce any ABI break compared to 2.1 though.

@lvc
Copy link

lvc commented Aug 14, 2016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants