Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Undefined vocabulary:ContactURLScopeVocab-members​ #439

Closed
kchason opened this issue Aug 9, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Undefined vocabulary:ContactURLScopeVocab-members​ #439

kchason opened this issue Aug 9, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
bug
Milestone
UCO 1.0.0

Comments

@kchason
Copy link
Contributor

kchason commented Aug 9, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Bug description

observable:ContactURL defines a SHACL constraint that, for any triple whose subject is a observable:ContactURL and whose predicate is observable:contactURLScope​, the value must be (either an xsd:string​ or a vocabulary:ContactURLScopeVocab​ that is also) an element of vocabulary:ContactURLScopeVocab-members​. However, vocabulary:ContactURLScopeVocab-members​ does not exist.

Proposed solution

Create a new vocabulary:ContactURLScopeVocab-members object similar to the vocabulary:ContactSIPScopeVocab-members and update the vocabulary:ContactSIPScopeVocab to point to the new members vocabulary.
@kchason kchason added the bug label Aug 9, 2022
@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor

This should already be addressed as part of the resolution of #406.

@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor

@kchason , I believe this was addressed in this specific part of the PR for #406:

https://github.com/ucoProject/UCO/pull/412/files#diff-40c3a2156e9752b255d59875d43a8ab5a94b3080b5df561164764be1d51f979dL1684

Thank you for the report!

@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist added this to the UCO 1.0.0 milestone Aug 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
UCO 1.0.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@kchason @ajnelson-nist