Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

compound:reflex vs. compound:prt #13

Open
dan-zeman opened this issue Aug 14, 2015 · 1 comment
Open

compound:reflex vs. compound:prt #13

dan-zeman opened this issue Aug 14, 2015 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@dan-zeman
Copy link
Member

Germanic verbal particles (appear in [en,nl,de,da,sv]; in [de] they are called "separable verb prefixes") should be attached to their verbs as compound:prt (currently used in UD1.1 in [en,sv,da]).

In HamleDT 2.0 Prague, we harmonized them as AuxT because of the analogy to reflexive particles of inherently reflexive verbs in Czech. Unfortunately it now leads to the UD relation compound:reflex, which is absolutely wrong. This must be corrected.

@dan-zeman dan-zeman self-assigned this Aug 14, 2015
@dan-zeman dan-zeman added this to the HamleDT 3.0 milestone Aug 14, 2015
@dan-zeman dan-zeman added the bug label Aug 14, 2015
@dan-zeman
Copy link
Member Author

Either we can distinguish the two cases already in the Prague style (introducing a new afun for verbal particles) or we can solve it during the conversion from Prague to UD (checking reflexivity might help).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant