You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In some cases, it would be more optimised to first do the boolean operation then rotate the solid.
For instance in the casing for PrincetonD TF coil, each component is a union and a cut of 3 components. This makes (3 + 1) x nb_of_casings boolean operations.
By first union/cut then rotate, you'd only union/cut once then rotate. Which would make 3 + nb_of_casings operations and would save up much computational time.
A nice feature would be to control what we do first
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In some cases, it would be more optimised to first do the boolean operation then rotate the solid.
For instance in the casing for PrincetonD TF coil, each component is a union and a cut of 3 components. This makes (3 + 1) x nb_of_casings boolean operations.
By first union/cut then rotate, you'd only union/cut once then rotate. Which would make 3 + nb_of_casings operations and would save up much computational time.
A nice feature would be to control what we do first
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: