You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The uncefact spec mandates using a jsonschema date for the "YYMMDD" format. It's not listed as one of the untdid2379JsonType types that requires an additional context.
What I'd like to know is what the recommended approach is for choosing the century for a date that only specifies the decade. Different libraries to different things and it'd be good to make sure we're confirming to the unece instead of some arbitrary library.
EG: Libraries always choose the century based on the current date. However they don't all have the same rollover points depending on the current date. EG: Today some libraries might map centuries from 00-70 to the 20th century and 71-99 to the 19th, other libraries might choose 00-69.
What is the recommendation for how the CC should be created for YYMMDD dates?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The uncefact spec mandates using a jsonschema date for the "YYMMDD" format. It's not listed as one of the untdid2379JsonType types that requires an additional context.
This is consistent with the ccts->edifact mappings recommended here - https://unece.org/DAM/cefact/codesfortrade/CCTS/CCTS-DTCatalogueVersion3p1.pdf
For YYMMDD it declares "Map to semantically equivalent ISO representa-
tion without century truncation"
What I'd like to know is what the recommended approach is for choosing the century for a date that only specifies the decade. Different libraries to different things and it'd be good to make sure we're confirming to the unece instead of some arbitrary library.
EG: Libraries always choose the century based on the current date. However they don't all have the same rollover points depending on the current date. EG: Today some libraries might map centuries from 00-70 to the 20th century and 71-99 to the 19th, other libraries might choose 00-69.
What is the recommendation for how the CC should be created for YYMMDD dates?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: