Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Notarization in GitHub Actions #63

Closed
jkachmar opened this issue Oct 24, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Notarization in GitHub Actions #63

jkachmar opened this issue Oct 24, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@jkachmar
Copy link

jkachmar commented Oct 24, 2020

As of macOS 10.15 (Catalina), Apple has started to strongly encourage Mac application notarization.

I've only done a bit of looking, but it seems like this is something that can be automated and built into the GitHub Actions CI pipeline. All of the technical stuff looks pretty straightforward, but Apple requires a paid developer account for the notarization process.

Can any of the maintainers support this? If not, would it be sufficient to add instructions for getting around the quarantine to this repo's README and/or the ungoogled software downloads page?

ref. ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium#859 for a related discussion. AFAICT, that pre-dates this repository having a CI process that generates the binaries, so I figured it might be worth re-opening a conversation on this repo.

@Eloston
Copy link
Member

Eloston commented Dec 13, 2020

I think it's sufficient to add instructions to getting around the quarantine for now. Having to pay for the notarization process is not ideal for a lot of other FOSS.

@claudiodekker
Copy link

For what it's worth, and at the very least for the next while, I'll be doing notarized releases (fully automated) of this repository's release builds over at https://github.com/claudiodekker/ungoogled-chromium-macos

While it's indeed not ideal that notarization is paid, 1Password wouldn't play nice without it, and so it was somewhat of a necessity for me anyway. At least this way the process is transparent, and others can take advantage of the same builds that I'm already signing for myself anyway!

@PF4Public
Copy link
Contributor

I hope your question(-s) has(-ve) been answered, otherwise please let us know.
Closing this issue for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants