Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Establish the decision making process #58

Closed
stasm opened this issue Mar 2, 2020 · 8 comments · Fixed by #75
Closed

Establish the decision making process #58

stasm opened this issue Mar 2, 2020 · 8 comments · Fixed by #75
Labels
organizational Issues related with MF group organization and workflow

Comments

@stasm
Copy link
Collaborator

stasm commented Mar 2, 2020

The first decision of the WG should be to decide how the following decisions will be made.

There are a number of models the WG could follow, including voting ones and consensus-driven ones. Are there established processes in Unicode at large or the CLDR TC?

@romulocintra
Copy link
Collaborator

romulocintra commented Mar 2, 2020

Hi @stasm at the moment I'm preparing a "Document/Manifesto" to be reviewed by the group about the model and about members, decisions etc... more details in the coming pull request.

@romulocintra
Copy link
Collaborator

#54 is related to this decision making to

@romulocintra romulocintra added the organizational Issues related with MF group organization and workflow label Mar 2, 2020
@stasm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

stasm commented Mar 2, 2020

Great to know, thanks @romulocintra.

I've seen #54 and it looked to me like it was about a concrete RFC process for new proposals. One step of the process will be the decision made by the WG about whether the RFC should be included in the standard. I filed this issue to figure out how the WG makes those decisions.

@romulocintra
Copy link
Collaborator

I started a draft document - WG guidelines.

My goal is to have this written down, for the next meeting in a Pull request format for each topic exposed in the document.

cc @sffc @echeran

guidelines/membership.md
guidelines/chair-group.md
guidelines/meetings.md
guidelines/decision-process.md
...

Probably with some of your ideas, you can help me with that, please feel free to edit, feedback ...

@sffc
Copy link
Member

sffc commented Mar 3, 2020

CC @mihnita

@romulocintra
Copy link
Collaborator

romulocintra commented Apr 13, 2020

cc @DavidFatDavidF initial document was created in #75

@DavidFatDavidF
Copy link
Collaborator

Proposed decision making process as #76

@DavidFatDavidF
Copy link
Collaborator

DavidFatDavidF commented Apr 21, 2020

I think that #75 and #76 should be merged to master and this issue closed. The membership.md is a different issue IMHO.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
organizational Issues related with MF group organization and workflow
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants