Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[docs] Incorrect description for keyId in the sdk @unkey/api for get operation #2211

Closed
DeepaPrasanna opened this issue Oct 5, 2024 · 7 comments · Fixed by #2212
Closed
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@DeepaPrasanna
Copy link
Contributor

Type of documentation issue

Incorrect Information

Describe the problem and the proposed solution

Problem:
test3

Solution:
The Id of the key you want to retrieve configuration.

@DeepaPrasanna DeepaPrasanna added Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Needs Approval Needs approval from Unkey labels Oct 5, 2024
Copy link

linear bot commented Oct 5, 2024

@chronark
Copy link
Collaborator

chronark commented Oct 5, 2024

/award 150

Copy link

oss-gg bot commented Oct 5, 2024

Awarding DeepaPrasanna: 150 points 🕹️ Well done! Check out your new contribution on oss.gg/DeepaPrasanna

@harshsbhat
Copy link
Contributor

/assign

Copy link

oss-gg bot commented Oct 5, 2024

Assigned to @harshsbhat! Please open a draft PR linking this issue within 48h ⚠️ If we can't detect a PR from you linking this issue in 48h, you'll be unassigned automatically 🕹️ Excited to have you ship this 🚀

Copy link

oss-gg bot commented Oct 7, 2024

@harshsbhat, Just a little reminder: Please open a draft PR linking this issue within 12 hours. If we can't detect a PR in 12h, you will be unassigned automatically.

1 similar comment
Copy link

oss-gg bot commented Oct 9, 2024

@harshsbhat, Just a little reminder: Please open a draft PR linking this issue within 12 hours. If we can't detect a PR in 12h, you will be unassigned automatically.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants