You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am experimenting with dinghy using 3 nodes each in their own container. I noticed that when I shutdown 2 of the nodes the remaining node becomes the leader. This would mean, i think, that if there was a network issue such that the node "a" was cut off from nodes "b" and "c", then node "a" would become a leader and "b" and "c" would elect a leader as well.
This was different from my assumption in that I expected that in the case where a consensus could not be reached no leader would be elected. Is my assumption just incorrect for this implementation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think the condition for TooFew needs to be modified to votes < int(len(d.Nodes)/2)+1 . Still testing this. I am also noticing that the when the initial leader is lost it takes a significant time to re-elect.
I am experimenting with dinghy using 3 nodes each in their own container. I noticed that when I shutdown 2 of the nodes the remaining node becomes the leader. This would mean, i think, that if there was a network issue such that the node "a" was cut off from nodes "b" and "c", then node "a" would become a leader and "b" and "c" would elect a leader as well.
This was different from my assumption in that I expected that in the case where a consensus could not be reached no leader would be elected. Is my assumption just incorrect for this implementation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: