Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Constraint Has Its Own Unique Name or ID #232

Closed
2 of 5 tasks
aj-stein-nist opened this issue Aug 26, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed
2 of 5 tasks

Constraint Has Its Own Unique Name or ID #232

aj-stein-nist opened this issue Aug 26, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@aj-stein-nist
Copy link
Collaborator

aj-stein-nist commented Aug 26, 2022

User Story:

As a NIST OSCAL developer, in order to consistently and easily identify a Metaschema constraint in any Metaschema model, I would like an identifier or name field to be allowed so I can uniquely define that constraint in that model.

Goals:

  • Model and design an @id or @name field that allows unique reference of a constraint in a given model
  • Implement it in Metaschema core schema

Original rationale and goals can be found in the comment, leading to the creation of this issue.

Dependencies:

N/A

Acceptance Criteria

  • All website and readme documentation affected by the changes in this issue have been updated. Changes to the website can be made in the docs/content directory of your branch.
  • A Pull Request (PR) is submitted that fully addresses the goals of this User Story. This issue is referenced in the PR.
  • The CI-CD build process runs without any reported errors on the PR. This can be confirmed by reviewing that all checks have passed in the PR.

{The items above are general acceptance criteria for all User Stories. Please describe anything else that must be completed for this issue to be considered resolved.}

@aj-stein-nist
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Dave wants to consider the creation of a micro-format to build (and potentially automatically generate respective IDs for each of them) the constraints and insert them in. Discuss with Dave and rewrite the feature's user story, goals, and AC.

@aj-stein-nist
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Removing OSCAL work board per discussion with @david-waltermire-nist.

@david-waltermire
Copy link
Collaborator

This has been implemented.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants