You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 14, 2024. It is now read-only.
Within the Logos Consensus model (c.f. #509), a "pluggable" behavior for node reputation may be specified. Such a "Reputation RFC" needs to be abstracted, reviewed, and written.
Acceptance criteria
This RFC will be reviewed by the appropriate peers as a series of pull requests.
Details
Although presumably the "Logos Consensus Model" (#509) will provide some framing context, this RFC would set up the necessary motivation for the initial version of the Inkingut node reputation algorithim, describe that algorithim, present a security model of potential adversaries, fill-in known attacks, and perhaps provide a reference implementation.
Inkingut is expected to evolve, so specifying a minimal protocol/implementation API, and a mechanism for its subsequent revision would perhaps be a good scope.
Possible Solutions
Write an RFC; get feedback on pull requests.
Notes
Currently getting #509 into a RAW state has priority, but developing a table of contents, and initial sections should be possible for reputation in the near term: it always helps to be working on a couple things.
As with #509, there is a sizable amount of markup in the notion.so system that can be used as a starting point.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
easye
changed the title
RFC about Logos Node Reputation
Logos Node Reputation RFC
Jun 22, 2022
Problem
Within the Logos Consensus model (c.f. #509), a "pluggable" behavior for node reputation may be specified. Such a "Reputation RFC" needs to be abstracted, reviewed, and written.
Acceptance criteria
This RFC will be reviewed by the appropriate peers as a series of pull requests.
Details
Although presumably the "Logos Consensus Model" (#509) will provide some framing context, this RFC would set up the necessary motivation for the initial version of the Inkingut node reputation algorithim, describe that algorithim, present a security model of potential adversaries, fill-in known attacks, and perhaps provide a reference implementation.
Inkingut is expected to evolve, so specifying a minimal protocol/implementation API, and a mechanism for its subsequent revision would perhaps be a good scope.
Possible Solutions
Write an RFC; get feedback on pull requests.
Notes
Currently getting #509 into a RAW state has priority, but developing a table of contents, and initial sections should be possible for reputation in the near term: it always helps to be working on a couple things.
As with #509, there is a sizable amount of markup in the notion.so system that can be used as a starting point.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: