-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comparing $\overline{w'w'}$ and $\overline{w'w'w'}$ tendency terms between ADC and LES #13
Comments
@katsmith133 Let me know if you spot anything that's incorrect or doesn't make sense! |
@BrodiePearson, I believe I've got correct terms plotted (splatting terms are left out for now as I am comparing to a non-splatting ADC run, the "no-splat, w2 BC off" run at 82 hours in): |
@katsmith133 These are interesting comparisons. I agree this we should discuss this today |
@BrodiePearson and @amrapallig, per our discussion yesterday, here is the comparisons for the various terms that go into the w2t term that is used in calculating w3tend5: w2t panel: black line - diagnosed from LES data as
Sw - tumd panels: blue lines - from ADC run, green lines - diagnosed from LES using ADC formulations It looks like using the ADC formulation on the LES data produces a w2t term that is still too small, indicating that something is missing from the ADC approximation of w2t. |
This issue lists the ADC tendency terms for$\overline{w'w'}$ and $\overline{w'w'w'}$ , and the analogous LES terms (where possible).
One avenue for diagnosing the skill of the ADC closure scheme is to compare whether the tendency terms in the scheme are comparable to LES data. The tendency terms in the ADC and LES schemes represent similar physical processes, but because the ADC scheme has closure assumptions that are distinct from Reynolds averaging (which is how we analyze LES fields), the tendency terms in the ADC and LES schemes differ in their form.
MPAS-Model/src/core_ocean/shared/mpas_ocn_adcReconstruct.F
Lines 565 to 566 in 5dc8d6e
MPAS-Model/src/core_ocean/shared/mpas_ocn_adcReconstruct.F
Lines 567 to 569 in 5dc8d6e
MPAS-Model/src/core_ocean/shared/mpas_ocn_adcReconstruct.F
Line 570 in 5dc8d6e
MPAS-Model/src/core_ocean/shared/mpas_ocn_adcReconstruct.F
Lines 571 to 572 in 5dc8d6e
MPAS-Model/src/core_ocean/shared/mpas_ocn_adcReconstruct.F
Lines 573 to 575 in 5dc8d6e
MPAS-Model/src/core_ocean/shared/mpas_ocn_adcReconstruct.F
Lines 314 to 316 in 5dc8d6e
We could add a combined pressure term that is only used for comparison with LES: w2tend_pressure$= w2tend3 + w2tend5 + w2tend6 - \frac{2\overline{w'w'}}{3\tau_{slow}} - \frac{\frac{4}{3}C_2}{2-\frac{4}{3}C_2} w2tend4$
Then, $w2tend$_$pressure \approx -2\overline{w'\frac{\partial p'}{\partial z}}$
Since$w2tend5$ also contains dissipation, perhaps we go one step further by combining pressure and dissipation terms
$w2tend1 + w2tend$_$pressure = -2\overline{w'\frac{\partial p'}{\partial z}} - \frac{2}{3}\epsilon $
MPAS-Model/src/core_ocean/shared/mpas_ocn_adcReconstruct.F
Line 486 in 5dc8d6e
MPAS-Model/src/core_ocean/shared/mpas_ocn_adcReconstruct.F
Lines 498 to 499 in 5dc8d6e
MPAS-Model/src/core_ocean/shared/mpas_ocn_adcReconstruct.F
Line 500 in 5dc8d6e
MPAS-Model/src/core_ocean/shared/mpas_ocn_adcReconstruct.F
Lines 504 to 505 in 5dc8d6e
MPAS-Model/src/core_ocean/shared/mpas_ocn_adcReconstruct.F
Lines 506 to 507 in 5dc8d6e
MPAS-Model/src/core_ocean/shared/mpas_ocn_adcReconstruct.F
Lines 303 to 305 in 5dc8d6e
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: