Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vrl Performance #9811

Closed
StephenWakely opened this issue Oct 27, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Vrl Performance #9811

StephenWakely opened this issue Oct 27, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
domain: performance Anything related to Vector's performance domain: vrl Anything related to the Vector Remap Language type: enhancement A value-adding code change that enhances its existing functionality.

Comments

@StephenWakely
Copy link
Contributor

Vrl frequently flags up as a bottleneck in our performance testing. We could benefit greatly from optimising the language.

We will start with an RFC to discuss the various options for moving the language forwards.

@StephenWakely StephenWakely added type: enhancement A value-adding code change that enhances its existing functionality. domain: performance Anything related to Vector's performance domain: vrl Anything related to the Vector Remap Language labels Oct 27, 2021
@blt
Copy link
Contributor

blt commented Oct 27, 2021

Not to beat a horse but we also see bits of vrl bottleneck builds too, per #9547.

@JeanMertz
Copy link
Contributor

I'll close this, as we never created the RFC (I believe, other than the VM RFC), but did do a lot of work to improve performance. Anything else we can still do is best described in specific issues to tackle specific performance problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
domain: performance Anything related to Vector's performance domain: vrl Anything related to the Vector Remap Language type: enhancement A value-adding code change that enhances its existing functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants