You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The original (non-regression-line) HTML is 342 kb but when adding the regression line, it's 1.2 MB. It now includes a lot of data values that don't have a valid y value. Consequently the range is now larger (because earlier dates on the x axis are now in the dataset even though they don't have y values).
The plotted datapoints are now rasterized, which I wasn't expecting.
Screenshots of the rendered HTML below.
Don't know if either of these are from vf's influence. But neither was expected.
"Make a much much smaller example" is a perfectly cromulent response. :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
(Also it would be pretty cool if, when vf doesn't support a particular feature, it would print some sort of warning, even if that warning is behind a flag. Thanks for considering this.)
I've been using vf to cull big dataframes of unecessary data when saving Altair plots to HTML. This works splendidly.
I am comparing two plots of the same data. One is just a scatter plot. The second is the same scatter plot with a regression line added on top of it.
Altair code looks like:
Anyway, I note:
Screenshots of the rendered HTML below.
Don't know if either of these are from vf's influence. But neither was expected.
"Make a much much smaller example" is a perfectly cromulent response. :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: