Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Version Control on the current MVSP “Checklist” #86

Open
tedescn opened this issue Jul 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Version Control on the current MVSP “Checklist” #86

tedescn opened this issue Jul 5, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@tedescn
Copy link

tedescn commented Jul 5, 2024

Could I please request the current MVSP “checklist” contains a version number as the listed historical versions do?

The use of the term “Latest Stable release” will not help when the current version becomes legacy.

Practically, an adopter would want to enforce against a named “checklist” version, ensuring that compliance doesn’t compromise other auditable frameworks. If compliance compromises are identified, an organisation may require time to modify activities in adjacent standards areas, before moving to the next version of the MVSP “checklist” version.

See https://mvsp.dev/mvsp.en/

Regards
Nigel

@acskurucz
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi Nigel,

If I understand the problem correctly there are 2 issues:

  • Version number for latest isn't displayed on the site
  • You can either link to latest or older versions, but can't link to the latest through it's version number

There is some level of consciousness here, because we expect companies to do a yearly review (control 1.3) so we expect that the latest is going to be the version measured against.

What would be the expected behavior?

If latest == v3.0-20231109 then redirect to /mvsp.en/v3.0-20231109 and dispay "You're viewing latest (v3.0-...)" somewhere on the page, otherwise "You're viewing v2.0-..." or similar?

Cheers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants