Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unexplained Cell Type Annotations #2

Open
guarelin opened this issue Oct 11, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Unexplained Cell Type Annotations #2

guarelin opened this issue Oct 11, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@guarelin
Copy link

Hi!

Thank you for this awesome dataset resource! There are a few cell type annotations I can't find in the paper, and after poking around the code, I'm still having a hard time defining them.

Namely:

  • hormones cell types for the endometrial cells/nuclei
  • eM cell types for the immune cells/nuclei

I could be missing something, but I would appreciate it if you can point me in the right direction.
Thank you!

@guarelin
Copy link
Author

guarelin commented Oct 11, 2024

Note - answered my own question via the supplement.

Supplement PDF

Hormones cell types - clusters of epithelial or mesenchymal cells from donors on exogenous hormones.

I still can't find info on the eM cell types though. There are 16 nucleus cell types in the figure at the bottom of this notebook:
Immune Nuclei MILO

But there are 18 nucleus cell types in this figure:
Extended Fig 8

In notebook but not figure:

  • eM1, eM2
  • these are also found in the h5ad data relase

In figure but not notebook:

  • uNK1_cycling
  • plasma B cell
  • uM1, uM2, uM2_cycling

To me it seems like eM1 and eM2 were renamed in the paper to uM1 and uM2

@luzgaral
Copy link
Contributor

luzgaral commented Oct 23, 2024

Hello,

Apologies eM (endometrial Macrophage) and uM (uterine Macrophage) are the same. So it is correct that eM1 and eM2 were renamed in the paper to uM1 and uM2. We will update our annotated objects to avoid further confusions.

Also note (i) Plasma B or uNK1_cycling cells are only detected in the single-cell (sc) or single-nucleus (sn) datasets, so keep this in mind; and (ii) MILO was run on the sn dataset to avoid technical batch effects introduced by different labs profiling the sc datasets.

Hope this makes sense. Please get in touch if you have any further question.

Best,

Luz

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants