Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

MPL-2.0 Licence not aligned with the rest of Next.js / Vercel that uses MIT and triggers legal queries #166

Open
JonParton opened this issue Feb 9, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

MPL-2.0 Licence not aligned with the rest of Next.js / Vercel that uses MIT and triggers legal queries #166

JonParton opened this issue Feb 9, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@JonParton
Copy link

JonParton commented Feb 9, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Hi There,

Similar to the issue below for the Edge Runtime and Next.js, using the MPL-2.0 licence triggers lots of queries from legal departments when used.

vercel/next.js#38467 (comment)

Is there any reason the Analytics package that must be installed to get full Vercel Analytics Capability is MP-2.0 rather then MIT like the rest of next.js etc?

Could this change as Vercel has done with the edge runtime packages in the comment above to align on the MIT license?

Many Thanks in advance!,
Jon
@JonParton JonParton changed the title MPL Licence not aligned with the rest of Next.js / Vercel that uses MIT and triggers legal queries MPL-2.0 Licence not aligned with the rest of Next.js / Vercel that uses MIT and triggers legal queries Feb 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@JonParton