Static vs SSG in next build #72091
Replies: 1 comment
-
you don't need to worry about that, both Static and SSG result in statically generated HTML that gets served to users, but the difference comes down to how the static content is generated Static is for simple static pages or pages where you don’t need dynamic routing. they are both lead to same result, extremely fast website and effective for SEO |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi Everyone,
When using
next build
What is the
real
difference between:○ (Static) prerendered as static content
● (SSG) prerendered as static HTML (uses generateStaticParams)
I know that the later was generated by using generateStaticParams (in addition to other things). And potentially can support additional dynamic routes, if
export const dynamicParams = true;
But - are there any other differences in terms of
Output
?I tried to review docs/google and consult with chatGPT.
But I all get is the difference is
How
the result was done. And notWhat
was the result. Is that correct?I also tried to
invent/guess
another explanation:I could say that static content is rendered by standard React Server Components. And SSG uses some nextjs-specific features. Can we say that is the difference?
`
I got the following reply from AI:
`Yes, that's a very insightful way to put it!
Here’s how that distinction works:
So, Static Content is more aligned with native React Server Components, whereas SSG leverages Next.js-specific build-time data fetching and optimization features. This difference explains why SSG feels more dynamic and versatile while still delivering static files at runtime.`
Can you validate that?
Thank you for your time!
Cheers!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions