subsystem | maintainers |
---|---|
benchmark/* |
@nodejs/benchmarking, @mscdex |
bootstrap_node.js |
@fishrock123 |
doc/* , *.md |
@nodejs/documentation |
lib/assert |
@nodejs/testing |
lib/buffer |
@nodejs/buffer |
lib/child_process |
@bnoordhuis, @cjihrig |
lib/cluster |
@bnoordhuis, @cjihrig, @mcollina |
lib/{crypto,tls,https} |
@nodejs/crypto |
lib/dgram |
@cjihrig, @mcollina |
lib/domains |
@misterdjules |
lib/fs , src/{fs,file} |
@nodejs/fs |
lib/{_}http{*} |
@nodejs/http |
lib/inspector.js , src/inspector_* |
@nodejs/v8-inspector |
lib/internal/url , src/node_url |
@nodejs/url |
lib/net |
@bnoordhuis, @indutny, @nodejs/streams |
lib/repl |
@addaleax, @fishrock123 |
lib/{_}stream{*} |
@nodejs/streams |
lib/timers |
@fishrock123, @misterdjules |
lib/util |
@bnoordhuis, @cjihrig, @evanlucas |
lib/zlib |
@addaleax, @bnoordhuis, @indutny |
src/async-wrap.* |
@nodejs/async_hooks |
src/node_api.* |
@nodejs/n-api |
src/node_crypto.* |
@nodejs/crypto |
test/* |
@nodejs/testing |
tools/eslint , .eslintrc |
@not-an-aardvark, @silverwind, @trott |
async_hooks | @nodejs/async_hooks for bugs/reviews (+ @nodejs/diagnostics for API) |
build | @nodejs/build |
performance | @nodejs/performance |
platform specific | @nodejs/platform-{aix,arm,freebsd,macos,ppc,smartos,s390,windows} |
python code | @nodejs/python |
upgrading c-ares | @jbergstroem |
upgrading http-parser | @jbergstroem, @nodejs/http |
upgrading libuv | @saghul |
upgrading npm | @fishrock123, @MylesBorins |
upgrading V8 | @nodejs/v8, @nodejs/post-mortem |
When things need extra attention, are controversial, or semver-major
: @nodejs/tsc
If you cannot find who to cc for a file, git shortlog -n -s <file>
may help.
We generally sort issues by a concept of "subsystem" so that we know what part(s) of the codebase it touches.
Subsystems generally are:
lib/*.js
doc
,build
,tools
,test
,deps
,lib / src
(special), and there may be others.meta
for anything non-code (process) related
There may be more than one subsystem valid for any particular issue / PR.
Please use these when possible / appropriate
confirmed-bug
- Bugs you have verified existdiscuss
- Things that need larger discussionfeature request
- Any issue that requests a new feature (usually not PRs)good first issue
- Issues suitable for newcomers to process
--
semver-{minor,major}
- be conservative – that is, if a change has the remote chance of breaking something, go for semver-major
- when adding a semver label, add a comment explaining why you're adding it
- minor vs. patch: roughly: "does it add a new method / does it add a new section to the docs"
- major vs. everything else: run last versions tests against this version, if they pass, probably minor or patch
- A breaking change helper (full source):
git checkout $(git show -s --pretty='%T' $(git show-ref -d $(git describe --abbrev=0) | tail -n1 | awk '{print $1}')) -- test; make -j4 test
We use labels to keep track of which branches a commit should land on:
dont-land-on-v?.x
- For changes that do not apply to a certain release line
- Also used when the work of backporting a change outweighs the benefits
land-on-v?.x
- Used by releasers to mark a PR as scheduled for inclusion in an LTS release
- Applied to the original PR for clean cherry-picks, to the backport PR otherwise
backport-requested-v?.x
- Used to indicate that a PR needs a manual backport to a branch in order to land the changes on that branch
- Typically applied by a releaser when the PR does not apply cleanly or it breaks the tests after applying
- Will be replaced by either
dont-land-on-v?.x
orbackported-to-v?.x
backported-to-v?.x
- Applied to PRs for which a backport PR has been merged
lts-watch-v?.x
- Applied to PRs which the LTS working group should consider including in a LTS release
- Does not indicate that any specific action will be taken, but can be effective as messaging to non-collaborators
lts-agenda
- For things that need discussion by the LTS working group
- (for example semver-minor changes that need or should go into an LTS release)
v?.x
- Automatically applied to changes that do not target
master
but rather thev?.x-staging
branch
- Automatically applied to changes that do not target
Once a release line enters maintenance mode, the corresponding labels do not need to be attached anymore, as only important bugfixes will be included.
- Operating system labels
macos
,windows
,smartos
,aix
- No linux, linux is the implied default
- Architecture labels
arm
,mips
,s390
,ppc
- No x86{_64}, since that is the implied default
git remote add upstream git://github.com/nodejs/node.git
to update from nodejs/node:
git checkout master
git remote update -p
ORgit fetch --all
(I prefer the former)git merge --ff-only upstream/master
(orREMOTENAME/BRANCH
)
- commit often, out to your github fork (origin), open a PR
- when making PRs make sure to spend time on the description:
- every moment you spend writing a good description quarters the amount of time it takes to understand your code.
- usually prefer to only squash at the end of your work, depends on the change