We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
currently, visjs-network is dual-licensed under both the Apache-2.0 and MIT permissive open source licenses.
I'm thinking about simplifying the license to only be Apache-2.0, to lower the cognitive load for potential new users of visjs-network
I prefer Apache-2.0 over MIT as it is more clear about patent grants (and so a more permissive license).
what do you think about shifting the project to a single permissive open-source license?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'll leave this open for comment for a few days, and then go ahead with this change if no serious objections are heard.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
currently, visjs-network is dual-licensed under both the Apache-2.0 and MIT permissive open source licenses.
I'm thinking about simplifying the license to only be Apache-2.0, to lower the cognitive load for potential new users of visjs-network
I prefer Apache-2.0 over MIT as it is more clear about patent grants (and so a more permissive license).
what do you think about shifting the project to a single permissive open-source license?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: