Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tips of this repo says 1x1 convolutions should constitute every other, or every third coupling block. What is this based on? #134

Open
mjack3 opened this issue Oct 26, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Tips of this repo says 1x1 convolutions should constitute every other, or every third coupling block. What is this based on? #134

mjack3 opened this issue Oct 26, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@mjack3
Copy link

mjack3 commented Oct 26, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Hello.

From the tips section of this amazing repo you wrote "Coupling blocks using 1x1 convolutions in the subnets seem important for the quality, they should constitute every other, or every third coupling block".

I would like to see what paper draw this conclusion. I am trying to find it but I do not see it.

Thanks!
@mjack3
Copy link
Author

mjack3 commented Nov 3, 2022

any news?

@mjack3 mjack3 changed the title What paper said that coupling blocks using 1x1 convolutions should constitute every other, or every third coupling block Tips of this repo says 1x1 convolutions should constitute every other, or every third coupling block. What is this based on? Nov 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mjack3