Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Concerning the problem of saving the workflow containing child nodes. #8

Open
807502278 opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@807502278
Copy link

It is recommended to include the child nodes in the saved workflow. Otherwise, when sharing a workflow with child nodes, you would have to look for the json files in the subnodes to package them, and then others would have to manually place these json files into the subnodes. Or, could we make an advanced save and load option to automatically package and unpackage the zip?

@vivax3794
Copy link
Owner

I have thought about this as well. And not quite sure how I want to attack it either, different save options do seem like the best way to go.

The question then becomes how editing these embedded workflows will work, just automatically unpacking them into the subnodes folder might not be desirable.

Inline editing is a request I have gotten from a few people so that would be a good option, although I am not sure how to best tackle that atm.

@807502278
Copy link
Author

807502278 commented Jul 10, 2024

This function of the main body is the same as that of the final child node. Although it is very difficult to use, could its save be referred to?
7SW%188VJ(8CU32O`H5@XMR
Of course, it's just reference save. I think the subnodes folder is quite useful

@vivax3794 vivax3794 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants