You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
-o DIR --output-dir=DIR Output directory (default based on program name).
To me, this means that the output directory is based on the program name by default. Sure enough, if I run ddlog -i foo.dl I end up with output in foo_ddlog. Cool.
So, if I run ddlog -i foo.dl -o bar, I'll get an output directory not based on the program name but named bar instead, right? No. Actually it's still based on the program name, just nested inside the bar directory:
[blp@sigxcpu]$ ddlog -i foo.dl -o bar
Finished compiling "foo.dl" in 0.76s
[blp@sigxcpu]$ ls bar/
foo_ddlog
[blp@sigxcpu]$
This doesn't do what I expect. I don't know whether the implementation is wrong (so that the code should be changed to do what I expect) or the usage message is wrong (so that the usage message should be changed to something like "output base directory (default is .)".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ddlog --help
says the following about-o
:To me, this means that the output directory is based on the program name by default. Sure enough, if I run
ddlog -i foo.dl
I end up with output infoo_ddlog
. Cool.So, if I run
ddlog -i foo.dl -o bar
, I'll get an output directory not based on the program name but namedbar
instead, right? No. Actually it's still based on the program name, just nested inside thebar
directory:This doesn't do what I expect. I don't know whether the implementation is wrong (so that the code should be changed to do what I expect) or the usage message is wrong (so that the usage message should be changed to something like "output base directory (default is .)".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: