You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think it can be confusing if, for example, in the old state we match id=foo and on the other side that pairs with css view-transition-name: foo.
The proposal is to "namespace" id matching. Basically id=foo would only match with id=foo and not with view-transition-name: foo. Or, in other words, names generated by the id attribute can only match elements that have names that are also generated by the id attribute.
We have a
view-transition-name: auto
that can use theid
attribute from the element as the view transition name. (https://www.w3.org/TR/css-view-transitions-2/#auto-vt-name)I think it can be confusing if, for example, in the old state we match
id=foo
and on the other side that pairs with cssview-transition-name: foo
.The proposal is to "namespace" id matching. Basically
id=foo
would only match withid=foo
and not withview-transition-name: foo
. Or, in other words, names generated by theid
attribute can only match elements that have names that are also generated by theid
attribute.@nt1m @noamr fyi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: