You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For whatwg/html#4143 I tried to define that buttons size in the inline direction like floats do, i.e. "shink-to-fit" (CSS 2.2 terminology) or "shrink-wrap" (HTML used this terminology until I changed it in that PR now), if the inline-size is auto.
It seems reasonable to define a term that means exactly this, that can be used by floats, abspos, buttons, legends, and whatever else uses this behavior.
I think it would be reasonable to define the term as "uses fit-content inline sizing" or something like that. (It's also nice when the term matches a name in author-exposed syntax like fit-content.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For whatwg/html#4143 I tried to define that buttons size in the inline direction like floats do, i.e. "shink-to-fit" (CSS 2.2 terminology) or "shrink-wrap" (HTML used this terminology until I changed it in that PR now), if the inline-size is auto.
It seems reasonable to define a term that means exactly this, that can be used by floats, abspos,
button
s,legend
s, and whatever else uses this behavior.In IRC, @dbaron said
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: