Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Possible typo in the text related to "simple interpretations" #58

Open
MaximeJakubowski opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
Labels
spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)

Comments

@MaximeJakubowski
Copy link

In the text below the definition of a "simple interpretation" there is the sentence:

The distinction between IR and IL will become significant below when the semantics of datatypes are defined. IL is allowed to be partial because some literals may fail to have a referent.

Should "IR" not be "IS", since it is about the mappings from the interpretation and "IR" is a set, not a mapping?

@pfps
Copy link
Contributor

pfps commented Dec 12, 2024

It looks as if you are correct and IR should be replaced with IS.

@pfps pfps added the spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2) label Dec 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants