Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

em-dashes are better than commas, in some places #72

Open
TallTed opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

em-dashes are better than commas, in some places #72

TallTed opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)

Comments

@TallTed
Copy link
Member

TallTed commented Jan 23, 2025

Originally posted by @TallTed in #64 (comment)

I want to make sure that discussion happens on my em-dash change requests which were marked "resolved" in PR #64, but which were not applied nor discussed there, and which I cannot mark "unresolved":

  1. Recognize rdf:dirLangString #64 (comment)

  2. Recognize rdf:dirLangString #64 (comment)

The above are about the lines visible at this permalink, which may no longer be 754–761.
@TallTed
Copy link
Member Author

TallTed commented Jan 27, 2025

I've made another change suggestion on #64, which may obviate this issue, at least for this instance.

@pfps pfps added the spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2) label Jan 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@TallTed @pfps