-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WoT use case contribution #11
Comments
@danielwilms several, see my ramblings in slack about who we should convene to collect. close to discussion on today's call and component, subsequently lifecycle view |
For RPC effort we've come up with a number of use cases that could be candidates here as well. You've expressed interest in trying out WoT for RPC. https://www.w3.org/community/autowebplatform/wiki/RPC#Use_Cases The one I like the most is unattended remote delivery to a vehicle. |
I just want to reactivate this topic here because the WoT Use Case TF wants to publish a new version of the WoT Use Case document and it would be cool to have vsso in it.
Theoretical, you can provide multiple use cases as it is done here for smart home scenarios. Regarding your shared link, I would also like to see the eCharging scenario as this requires interoperability considerations. Usually, several actors are involved, e.g. the vehicle itself (e.g. how much to charge), the driver (e.g., when do I need the vehicle the next time), the smart grid (e.g. how much renewable energy is currently produced), the smart building (e.g. current building consumption), etc. Would it be possible for you to participate in one of the next Use Case Calls, which will take place on Tuesday at 2pm CET? |
Web of Things (WoT) is looking for use case contributions, which can be found here:
https://w3c.github.io/wot-usecases/
Let's discuss a possible contribution. Any opinion @tguild?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: