Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CSS Values and Units - two links have been interchanged #620

Open
soren-50 opened this issue Mar 24, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

CSS Values and Units - two links have been interchanged #620

soren-50 opened this issue Mar 24, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
content Copy, imagery or other content

Comments

@soren-50
Copy link

https://www.w3.org/TR (W3C standards and drafts), section CSS Values and Units

The links to history for level 3 and 4 have been interchanged.

@soren-50 soren-50 added the content Copy, imagery or other content label Mar 24, 2024
@vivienlacourba
Copy link
Member

Hi @soren-50,

I'm looking at https://www.w3.org/TR/?filter-tr-name=css+value but I am not able to identify the error you are reporting.

The "CSS Values and Units Module Level 3" history link seems to point rightly to: https://www.w3.org/standards/history/css-values-3/

And "CSS Values and Units Module Level 4" has its history link pointing to https://www.w3.org/standards/history/css-values-4/

@vivienlacourba vivienlacourba self-assigned this Mar 24, 2024
@soren-50
Copy link
Author

Sorry, I was wrong.
I was looking at "In this section" and was confused by the reference being the heading for another section, not the actual.

Within W3C standards and drafts, the construction "In this section" obviously is unique for CSS Values.
I have not checked all the standards, but anyway the construction is not utilized in relation to User Timing Level 2 and 3.

But there is a difference in status for the standards "CSS Values" and "User Timing", which could be the explanation :-) :
User Timing have a Standard and a Candidate Standard.
CSS Values have a Draft Standard and a Candidate Standard.

Now you know, why somebody denotes me being a dabbler :-)

/Soren

@vivienlacourba
Copy link
Member

I'm guessing the confusion came from using "In this section" as that menu title. Issue #655 suggests renaming this menu as "Related".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content Copy, imagery or other content
Projects
Status: 📋 To do
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants