Review architecture document consistency

[mlagally]

Please review architecture document consistency by Feb 4th.

This includes:

• verifying terminology
• checking text in normative chapers
• verifying that assertions are fit for purpose
• proposing additional normative text, if required

For a reference of the document structure, please use #646

If you find any problem that requires normative changes, please create an issue and a PR by Feb 4th. to allow
for review and inclusion into the spec.

For all other problems, please create an issue in github.

[mlagally]

Arch call on May 11th: No further feedback expected, closing.

[egekorkan]

There are still assertions that need to be removed, so I would say that this check is not completed

[mlagally]

Remaining issues:

• arch-id-correlation : An identifier in the WoT Thing Description MUST allow for the correlation of multiple TDs representing the same original Thing or ultimately unique physical entity. #635
• arch-thing-bundling : Things MAY be bundled together with a Consumer to enable Thing-to-Thing interaction. #634
• Remove operation type related assertions #767
• [Index] Section structure, assertions, and issues #646

[mlagally]

Arch call on June 23rd:
All remaining issues have been addressed.
If there are individual smaller problems, please file a new issue and don't reopen these omnibus issues.