Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Policy Proposal] Invite Expert Selection Procedure #1171

Open
egekorkan opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

[Policy Proposal] Invite Expert Selection Procedure #1171

egekorkan opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@egekorkan
Copy link
Contributor

egekorkan commented Jan 24, 2024

As discussed in the main call today, we need a policy on how Invited Experts (IEs) are chosen. Some basic requirements/processes:

  • They are invited by the chairs and the team contact together. This may be in response to a nomination.
  • They should show their expertise in a call, e.g. making a presentation
  • They should explain their commitment to WoT deliverables and meetings
  • Chairs and team contact must have consensus to accept an IE, taking into account the group input
@sebastiankb
Copy link
Collaborator

from today's WG planning session, @ashimura will provide a first proposal about this policy

@mjkoster
Copy link
Contributor

mjkoster commented Feb 7, 2024

7/2/2024 IG session
Need to add a nomination policy.

@mjkoster
Copy link
Contributor

9/27/2024 updated and agreed on description at TPAC, will ask for resolution at the next main call

@mmccool
Copy link
Contributor

mmccool commented Dec 9, 2024

Given that we just cleared out seven old applications for not following our (understood) policy, I think it would be good to get our current policy in writing somewhere. For this in particular it would be good to have an explicit policy to point applicants to. I think the initial description is a good start, but we probably need to add a few details:

  1. Length and content of presentation
  2. Decision procedure, e.g. group consensus, 2wks notice, etc.
  3. What constitutes "commitment". I would say attending at least one regular meeting but we do have people who contribute without necessarily being regular meeting attendees, so we should allow for that, but should identify a threshold (number of PRs, issue comments, etc.).

@mmccool
Copy link
Contributor

mmccool commented Dec 11, 2024

@mjkoster can you make a PR for this? It seems we are basically in agreement, just need to hammer out the details

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants