For manifest in FPWD: Should manifest TITLE be Required per WCAG 2?

[Ryladog]

https://rawgit.com/w3c/wpub/manifest-consensus-proposal/index-manifest-proposal.html#abstract-versus-concrete-manifest

[lrosenthol]

I assume the relevant part of WCAG is this - https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/navigation-mechanisms-title.html

If so, I would argue that there is nothing there that requires a title in a web publication itself. Only in the actual content documents that make up the WP.

[iherman]

Admin comment: this sounds like a duplicate of issue #20. @Ryladog, I would prefer to close this, referring back to that one; would you agree?

[avneeshsingh]

My understanding is that WP requires the title. WCAG 2.0 don't mention manifest in the SC or techniques at 1.
I think that it is up to us to figure out how this WCAG 2.0 requirement can be met, and then recommend the technique in WCAG 2.1.

http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/quickref/20070517/Overview.php#navigation-mechanisms-title

[TzviyaSiegman]

This issue is resolved with #51

[iherman]

See telco discussion on closure.