HTML Ruby Markup Extensions 2024-05-23

[frivoal]

• name of spec to be reviewed: HTML Ruby Markup Extensions

• URL of spec: https://www.w3.org/TR/2024/WD-html-ruby-extensions-20240523/

• Current Rec phase: Working Draft, recently restored from having been temporarily discontinued as a Note

• What and when is your next expected transition: no specific date has been decided, but significant changes are not anticipated before CR, and there exist some implementations, so absent new problematic feedback, we may be in a good shape for moving to and beyond CR before long. Autumn maybe?

• What has changed since any previous review? The spec had been discontinued for some years, so any review is at this point ancient. Should be reviewed from scratch.

• Please point to the results of your self-review : Responses to the Security and Privacy Self-Review questionaire w3c/html-ruby#12

• Where and how to file issues arising? Please open individual issues in https://github.com/w3c/html-ruby/issues

• Pointer to any explainer for the spec: The spec is intended to contain its own explainer. Specifically:

  • https://www.w3.org/TR/html-ruby-extensions/#intro gives a general intro to the problem space
  • https://www.w3.org/TR/html-ruby-extensions/#relations gives an high level overview of how this relates to the HTML spec
  • https://www.w3.org/TR/html-ruby-extensions/#diff-html gets into the specifics of the motivations for proposing changes to the HTML model
  • The spec has numerous examples. In particular, https://www.w3.org/TR/html-ruby-extensions/#ruby-compound is an author-centric non-normative section focused on illustrating both how you're supposed to use the markup patterns the spec defines and enables, and why you'd want to.

  Also, The i18n group has produced a variety of articles about ruby and its needs over the years, in line with what this spec is defining. https://www.w3.org/International/articles/ruby/markup.en is particularly relevant, but there are more if desired.

  Further, this somewhat old but still relevant blog post covers the why and the what of this design quite extensively: https://fantasai.inkedblade.net/weblog/2011/ruby/

[pes10k]

This review was discussed on the June 6th PING call. We did not identify any privacy concerns so closing this issue out