-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 68
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PSP categorization schema #42
Comments
One suggestion of a subcategorisation schema could be to slighlty modify the current numbering system. Appending a letter to the right side could be used to indicate the context which the PSP is operating upon. Something like:
|
@xgreenx also suggested on our AmsterDOT discussion:
|
bernardoaraujor
changed the title
PSP subcategorization schema
PSP categorization schema
Apr 22, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I've been studying the Core EIPs and got curious:
Is there any schema classifying PSPs in terms of:
pallet-contracts
orpallet-evm
(which could also be another form of subcategorization)in case there isn't, wouldn't it make sense for us to introduce some?
The rationale would be the argument that Smart Contract and Runtime are fundamentally different layers of execution under the Polkadot protocol, so it would make sense to have the PSP structure reflect that in some way or another. That would also help the audience assimilate those fundamental differences from the PSP structure itself.
The way they are structured now, the PSPs give some descriptive context, frequently on the
Motivation
section.But it would be useful to help the reader assimilate inherently foundational concepts about the PSP even before they start reading it, because they already know the PSP belongs to a certain category.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: