New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

阅读反馈 #18

Open

musicaudience opened this issue May 18, 2021 · 2 comments

musicaudience commented May 18, 2021

建议 "逻辑斯蒂回归" 变为 "逻辑回归" 可能会更简洁一点。
第 25 页的 "序贯" 一词可能是 "序列" 或 "时序" 的笔误。

liyc-ai commented May 23, 2021

如果不是音译”logistics“，那也应该是周志华老师《机器学习》书翻译的”对率回归“更好，而不是”逻辑回归“，因为本身这个回归方法跟”逻辑“关系并不大；
通用的说法就是”序贯决策过程“。

Owner

wangshusen commented Jun 1, 2021

建议 "逻辑斯蒂回归" 变为 "逻辑回归" 可能会更简洁一点。

第 25 页的 "序贯" 一词可能是 "序列" 或 "时序" 的笔误。

非常感谢你的反馈意见。我和你的想法一样，但是我的coauthor觉得那种写法更严谨。

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment